<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return to SSME &#8211; Ares V undergoes evaluation into potential switch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/ssme-ares-v-undergoes-evaluation-potential-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/ssme-ares-v-undergoes-evaluation-potential-switch/</link>
	<description>Giving space it's place on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ares/Orion slipping up to 18 months - Shuttle extension gains upper hand &#124; NASASpaceFlight.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/ssme-ares-v-undergoes-evaluation-potential-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Ares/Orion slipping up to 18 months - Shuttle extension gains upper hand &#124; NASASpaceFlight.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/?p=8347#comment-525</guid>
		<description>[...] The situation with Ares is known in key areas of the Agency, with a &#8220;9th Floor&#8221; NASA HQ effort already taking place to evaluate the viability of cancelling Ares I, and replacing the launch vehicle with an EELV (Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle) - such as an Atlas V Heavy or a Delta IV Heavy - whilst moving the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) effort towards concentrating on Ares V. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The situation with Ares is known in key areas of the Agency, with a &#8220;9th Floor&#8221; NASA HQ effort already taking place to evaluate the viability of cancelling Ares I, and replacing the launch vehicle with an EELV (Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle) &#8211; such as an Atlas V Heavy or a Delta IV Heavy &#8211; whilst moving the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) effort towards concentrating on Ares V. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasa 2010-2015 - Page 4 - Videogiochi Forum su Multiplayer.it</title>
		<link>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/ssme-ares-v-undergoes-evaluation-potential-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasa 2010-2015 - Page 4 - Videogiochi Forum su Multiplayer.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/?p=8347#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] paio di notizie:  - Uno studio sta valutando se per il primo stadio di Ares V conviene usare degli SSME &quot;usa e getta&quot; invece che degli [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] paio di notizie:  &#8211; Uno studio sta valutando se per il primo stadio di Ares V conviene usare degli SSME &quot;usa e getta&quot; invece che degli [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
