<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NASASpaceFlight.com &#187; STS-126. MMOD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/tag/sts-126-mmod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com</link>
	<description>Giving space it's place on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pristine Endeavour deservicing at Edwards &#8211; Window 6 damage failed to spread</title>
		<link>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/endeavour-deservicing-window-damage-failed-to-spread/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/endeavour-deservicing-window-damage-failed-to-spread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shuttle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STS-126. MMOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/?p=8113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engineers are working through post flight deservicing tasks on Endeavour at Dryden Flight Research Facility (DFRC)/Edwards Air Force Base, with opening engineering images and notes pointing towards an extremely clean vehicle, following Sunday&#8217;s landing in California. Images of Endeavour&#8217;s Window 6 &#8220;thermal pane&#8221; &#8211; which suffered from a MMOD strike on orbit &#8211; show the [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/endeavour-departs-edwards-sca-piggyback-ride-texas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Endeavour and her SCA piggyback ride arrive in Louisiana, via JSC flyover'>Endeavour and her SCA piggyback ride arrive in Louisiana, via JSC flyover</a> <small>The Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) and Endeavour departed from Edwards...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineers are working through post flight deservicing tasks on Endeavour at Dryden Flight Research Facility (DFRC)/Edwards Air Force Base, with opening engineering images and notes pointing towards an extremely clean vehicle, following Sunday&#8217;s landing in California. Images of Endeavour&#8217;s Window 6 &#8220;thermal pane&#8221; &#8211; which suffered from a MMOD strike on orbit &#8211; show the damage did not spread during re-entry.</p>
<p><span id="more-8113"></span></p>
<p>Endeavour was towed to the Mate/Demate facility &#8211; which is used for deservicing the orbiter, and for lifting orbiters on to the back of the SCA (Shuttle Carrier Aircraft) &#8211; late on Sunday local time.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/endeavour-lands-at-edwards-to-conclude-sts-126/" target="_blank">Endeavour successfully landed at DFRC at 1626 EST yesterday</a>. The orbiter was spotted at the Mate/Demate at 0106 EST Monday morning,&#8221; noted post flight processing. &#8220;Post landing operations continue.&#8221;</p>
<p>A couple of issues were noted with the opening procedures. notably with the process of transferring power from Endeavour&#8217;s Fuel Cells to ground power at the Mate/Demate facility. However, that was expected to be resolved without a timeline hit to S5022 operations.</p>
<p>The opening report on the condition of Endeavour has already been created, which backs up Mission Management Team (MMT) chair Leroy Cain&#8217;s praise for what he believes could may be the &#8220;cleanest&#8221; orbiter ever, due to the lack of any notable TPS (Thermal Protection System) damage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/a2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8115" style="black 5px solid;" src="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/a2.jpg" alt="" width="248" height="187" /></a>Opening evaluations into the landing gear point to good performance during landing &#8211; <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/endeavour-re-entry-edwards-landing-possible/" target="_blank">despite the shorter runway Endeavour touched down on</a>. 800 feet of runway still remained when the orbiter&#8217;s wheels stopped.</p>
<p>The runway report is the fourth milestone check of the orbiter&#8217;s TPS, following <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/fd2-complete-endeavour-pursues-iss/" target="_blank">Flight Day 2 inspections</a> via the OBSS (Orbiter Boom Sensor System), <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/endeavour-iss-to-start-docked-sts-126/" target="_blank">Flight Day 3&#8242;s RPM (Rbar Pitch Maneuver)</a> images taken from the International Space Station (ISS), <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/endeavour-undocks-late-inspections/" target="_blank">and Flight Day 15&#8242;s Late Inspections</a>, which finally clear the orbiter for re-entry. The lack of damage is mainly thanks to <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/mplm-attached-et-129-extremely-clean/" target="_blank">the performance of Endeavour&#8217;s External Tank (ET-129</a>). which suffered hardly any foam loss during ascent.</p>
<p>&#8220;Overall the vehicle looked very clean. No further degradation to the damages noted in <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/dat-role-endeavour-tps-safe-return/" target="_blank">RPM photos</a> was observed,&#8221; noted the runway report on L2. &#8220;Approximately 5 tiles had damages greater than 1.0 inch</p>
<p>&#8220;One location of protruding Ames gap filler (<a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/dat-role-endeavour-tps-safe-return/" target="_blank">as noted on orbit RPM images</a>) was found. Ames was protruding approximately 0.5&#8221;. No noticeable local overtemp or change from the on-orbit photo.</p>
<p>In total, only about 10 areas &#8211; <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/dat-role-endeavour-tps-safe-return/" target="_blank">all matching the RPM photography </a>- were listed in the runway report on TPS damage, which is extremely low compared to most flights. Only a handful of areas received some notes of interest, notable on the OMS (Orbital Manuvering System) Pods.</p>
<div><span style="MS Shell Dlg;"><span style="Arial;"><div class="L2Info right"><h4>See Also</h4><ul><li><a href="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=4.0">STS-126 POST FLIGHT UPDATES</a></li><li><a href="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=33.0">L2 STS-126 Special (3,500mb)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/">Click here to Join L2</a></li></ul></div></span></span></div>
<p>&#8220;Two body flap lower surface tiles have minor damages that appear to have sintered during reentry. Base heat shield tile damage appeared unchanged from the on-orbit photo. Dome heat shield blanket had no tears,&#8221; added the report.</p>
<div>
<p>&#8220;LH (Left Hand) OMS pod gap fillers were protruding similar to on-orbit photos, and were slightly more frayed. Large tile damage on RH (Right Hand) OMS engine base, adjacent to stinger, part number unknown. Dimensions approximately 2&#8221; x 3&#8221;&#8221;</p></div>
<p>The main area of interest related to how <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/11/extensive-process-mmod-strike-endeavour-window/" target="_blank">Endeavour&#8217;s Window 6 (Pilot side) performed during the return, following the MMOD hit on orbit</a>. While the damage was only to the first of the there panes each window has, thus was safe to re-enter with, extensive analysis was performed by engineers on the ground.</p>
<p>The worst case scenario related to the damage spreading, resulting in small fragments liberating from the window and potentially impacting the aft of the orbiter.<br />
<a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/a3.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8116" style="black 5px solid;" src="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/a3.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="197" /></a>&#8220;Impacts are possible along upper surface from window to vertical tail. Maximum impact velocity on tail approximately 1100 ft/sec,&#8221; noted the Window 6 MMOD Debris Transport presentation on L2, published on FD13. &#8220;At higher Mach numbers and angles of attack impacts are limited to tail.&#8221;</p>
<p>This process of working to the worst case scenario is a regular feature of NASA&#8217;s safety regime, ensuring every possibility is understood, and that such situations have a factor of safety margin inbuilt.</p>
<p>This was still deemed as no threat to safety, due to the time on re-entry (late in the landing phase) this could have potentially occurred, and the small probability of the thermal pane cracking via the high pressures of re-entry.</p>
<p>As observed in several post landing photographs of the MMOD damage, the window did not crack, with only a small amount of thermal expansion of the damage around the hole caused by the MMOD.</p>
<p>&#8220;MMOD damage on Window 6 did not appear to propagate during reentry,&#8221; confirmed associated notes. The window will be replaced &#8211; as is normal &#8211; during post flight processing, when Endeavour returns to her Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF-2).</p>
<p>Endeavour will spend around five more days in California, before heading back to Florida on top of the SCA. A timeline and a flight path &#8211; which will involve several stopovers en route &#8211; is yet to be finalized, though the SCA/Endeavour pairing is expected to depart for the cross country trip on Sunday.<br />
<span style="Arial;"><br />
Click <a href="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=15153.0" target="_blank">HERE to watch MaxQ&#8217;s amazing STS-126 Review Video</a>.</span></p>
<div><span style="Arial;"><a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/"><em><span><span><span><em><span><span lang="EN-GB"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span style="#b85b5a;">L2 members</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></span></span></span></em></a><em><span><span><em><span><span lang="EN-GB">: All documentation &#8211; from which the above article has quoted snippets &#8211; is available in full in the related L2 sections, now over 4000 gbs in size.</span></span></em></span></span></em></span></div>
<img src="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=8113&amp;ts=1328918060" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/endeavour-departs-edwards-sca-piggyback-ride-texas/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Endeavour and her SCA piggyback ride arrive in Louisiana, via JSC flyover'>Endeavour and her SCA piggyback ride arrive in Louisiana, via JSC flyover</a> <small>The Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) and Endeavour departed from Edwards...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/12/endeavour-deservicing-window-damage-failed-to-spread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

